William H. Hendron, (Lincoln's Law partner in Ill) - 1860
Liberty and slavery, civilization and barbarism, are absolute
antagonisms. One or the other must perish on this continent.
If we make a thousand compromises this civilization or that higher
and grander one just springing up will spring at the throat of
it's foe, and choke the life out of it, or die in the attempt.
Compromise - Compromise? why I am sick of it. Fools may compromise
and reason that all is peace; but those who have read human history
those who know human nature that compromises aggravate in the
end all our difficulties. The pathway of the sweep of man is
paved with the fragments of blasted agreements, which were made
to impede the progress of the right, or to bolster up despotism;
and will not men learn a lesson from all this? There is no dodging
the question. Let the natural struggle, heaven high and hell
deep go on
. I am thoroughly convinced that the two civilizations
cannot co-exist on the same soil and be co-equal in the Federal
brotherhood. To expect otherwise would be to expect absolute
heaven to sleep with and tolerate "hell".
New Orleans Bee, LA. December 1860 -
(The chief obstacle to reconciliation) is the absolute impossibility
of revolutionizing Northern Opinion in the relation to slavery.
Without a change of heart radical and through, all guarantees
which might be offered are not worth the paper on which they
are inscribed. As long as slavery is looked upon by the North
with abhorrence; as long as the South is regarded as a mere slave
breeding and slave driving community as long as false and pernicious
theories are cherished respecting the inherent equality and rights
of every human being, there can be no satisfactory political
union between the two sections. If one half of the people believe
the other half to be deeply dyed in inequity; to be daily and
hourly in the perpetuation of the most atrocious moral offense,
and in some sort constrained to lecture them, and to abuse them,
and to employ all possible means to break up their institutions
and to take from them what the Northern half considers property
unrighteously held or not property at all, how can two such antagonistic
nationalities dwell together in fraternal concord under the same
government. The feelings, customs, mode of thought, and education
of the two sections are discrepant and often antagonistic. The
North and the South are heterogeneous and are better off apart.