|
As originally published in The Atlantic Monthly
September 1902
Of the Training of Black Men
by W. E. B. Du Bois
FROM the shimmering swirl of waters where many, many thoughts ago
the slave-ship first saw the square tower of Jamestown have flowed down to
our day three streams of thinking: one from the larger world here and
over-seas, saying, the multiplying of human wants in culture lands calls
for the world-wide cooperation of men in satisfying them. Hence arises
a new human unity, pulling the ends of the earth nearer, and all men,
black, yellow, and white. The larger humanity strives to feel in this
contact of living nations and sleeping hordes a thrill of new life in
the world, crying, If the contact of Life and Sleep be Death, shame on
such Life. To be sure, behind this thought lurks the afterthought of
force and dominion, -- the making of brown men to delve when
the temptation of beads and red calico cloys.
The second thought streaming from the death-ship and the curving
river is the thought of the older South: the sincere and passionate
belief that somewhere between men and cattle God created a tertium
quid, and called it a Negro, -- a clownish, simple creature, at times
even lovable within its limitations, but straitly foreordained to walk
within the Veil. To be sure, behind the thought lurks the afterthought,
-- some of them with favoring chance might become men, but in sheer
self-defense we dare not let them, and build about them walls so high,
and hang between them and the light a veil so thick, that they
shall not even think of breaking through.
And last of all there trickles down that third and darker thought,
the thought of the things themselves, the confused half-conscious
mutter of men who are black and whitened, crying Liberty, Freedom,
Opportunity -- vouchsafe to us, O boastful World, the chance of living
men! To be sure, behind the thought lurks the afterthought: suppose,
after all, the World is right and we are less than men? Suppose this
mad impulse within is all wrong, some mock mirage from the
untrue?
So here we stand among thoughts of human unity, even
through conquest and slavery; the inferiority of black men, even
if forced by fraud; a shriek in the night for the freedom of men who
themselves are not yet sure of their right to demand it. This is the
tangle of thought and afterthought wherein we are called to solve the
problem of training men for life.
Behind all its curiousness, so attractive alike to sage
and dilettante, lie its dim dangers, throwing across us shadows
at once grotesque and awful. Plain it is to us that what the
world seeks through desert and wild we have within our threshold,
-- a stalwart laboring force, suited to the semi-tropics; if, deaf
to the voice of the Zeitgeist, we refuse to use and develop
these men, we risk poverty and loss. If, on the other hand, seized
by the brutal afterthought, we debauch the race thus caught in
our talons, selfishly sucking their blood and brains in the future as
in the past, what shall save us from national decadence? Only
that saner selfishness which, Education teaches men, can find
the rights of all the whirl of work.
Again, we may decry the color prejudice of the South, yet it remains
a heavy fact. Such curious kinks of the human mind exist and must be
reckoned with soberly. They cannot be laughed away, nor always
successfully stormed at, nor easily abolished by act of legislature.
And yet they cannot be encouraged by being let alone. They must be
recognized as facts, but unpleasant facts; things that stand in the way
of civilization and religion and common decency. They can be met in
but one way: by the breadth and broadening of human reason, by
catholicity of taste and culture. And so, too, the native ambition and
aspiration of men, even though they be black, backward, and ungraceful,
must not lightly be dealt with. To stimulate wildly weak and untrained
minds is to play with mighty fires; to flout their striving idly is to
welcome a harvest of brutish crime and shameless lethargy in our very
laps. The guiding of thought and the deft coordination of deed is at
once the path of honor and humanity.
And so, in this great question of reconciling three vast
and partially contradictory streams of thought, the one panacea
of Education leaps to the lips of all: such human training as
will best use the labor of all men without enslaving or
brutalizing; such training as will give us poise to encourage the
prejudices that bulwark society, and stamp out those that in
sheer barbarity deafen us to the wail of prisoned souls within the
Veil, and the mounting fury of shackled men.
But when we have vaguely said Education will set this
tangle straight, what have we uttered but a truism? Training for
life teaches living; but what training for the profitable living
together of black men and white? Two hundred years ago our
task would have seemed easier. Then Dr. Johnson blandly assured us
that education was needful solely for the embellishments of life, and
was useless for ordinary vermin. To-day we have climbed to heights
where we would open at least the outer courts of knowledge to all,
display its treasures to many, and select the few to whom its mystery
of Truth is revealed, not wholly by truth or the accidents of the stock
market, but at least in part according to deftness and aim, talent
and character. This programme, however, we are sorely puzzled
in carrying out through that part of the land where the blight
of slavery fell hardest, and where we are dealing with two backward
peoples. To make here in human education that ever necessary
combination of the permanent and the contingent -- of the ideal and the
practical in workable equilibrium -- has been there, as it ever must in
every age and place, a matter of infinite experiment and frequent
mistakes.
In rough approximation we may point out four varying decades of work
in Southern education since the Civil War. From the close of the war
until 1876 was the period of uncertain groping and temporary relief.
There were army schools, mission schools, and schools of the Freedman's
Bureau in chaotic disarrangement, seeking system and cooperation.
Then followed ten years of constructive definite effort toward
the building of complete school systems in the South. Normal schools
and colleges were founded for the freedmen, and teachers trained there
to man the public schools. There was the inevitable tendency of war to
underestimate the prejudices of the master and the ignorance of the
slave, and all seemed clear sailing out of the wreckage of the storm.
Meantime, starting in this decade yet especially developing from 1885
to 1895, began the industrial revolution of the South. The land
saw glimpses of a new destiny and the stirring of new ideals.
The educational system striving to complete itself saw new obstacles
and a field of work ever broader and deeper. The Negro colleges,
hurriedly founded, were inadequately equipped, illogically distributed,
and of varying efficiency and grade; the normal and high schools were
doing little more than common school work, and the common schools were
training but a third of the children who ought to be in them, and
training these too often poorly. At the same time the white South,
by reason of its sudden conversion from the slavery ideal, by
so much the more became set and strengthened in its
racial prejudice, and crystallized it into harsh law and harsher
custom; while the marvelous pushing forward of the poor white
daily threatened to take even bread and butter from the mouths
of the heavily handicapped sons of the freedmen. In the midst, then,
of the larger problem of Negro education sprang up the more practical
question of work, the inevitable economic quandary that faces a people
in the transition from slavery to freedom, and especially those who
make that change amid hate and prejudice, lawlessness and ruthless
competition.
The industrial school springing to notice in this decade, but coming
to full recognition in the decade beginning with 1895, was the
proffered answer to this combined educational and economic crisis, and
an answer of singular wisdom and timeliness. From the very first in
nearly all the schools some attention had been given to training in
handiwork, but now this training first raised to a dignity that brought
it in direct touch with the South's magnificent industrial development,
and given an emphasis which reminded black folk that before the
Temple of Knowledge swing the Gates of Toil.
Yet after all they are but gates, and when turning our eyes from the
temporary and contingent in the Negro problem to the broader question
of the permanent uplifting and civilization of black men in America, we
have a right to inquire, as this enthusiasm for material advancement
mounts to its height, if after all the industrial school is the final
and sufficient answer in the training of the Negro race; and to ask
gently, but in all sincerity, the ever recurring query of the ages, Is
not life more than meat, and the body more than raiment? And men ask
this to-day all the more eagerly because of the sinister signs
in recent educational movements. The tendency is here, born
of slavery and quickened to renewed life by the crazy imperialism of
the day, to regard human beings as among the material resources of a
land to be trained with an eye single to future dividends. Race
prejudices, which keep brown and black men in their "places," we are
coming to regard as useful allies with such a theory, no matter how
much they may dull the ambition and sicken the hearts of struggling
human beings. And above all, we daily hear that an education that
encourages aspiration, that sets the loftiest of ideals and seeks as an
end culture and character rather than bread-winning, is the privilege
of white men and the danger and delusion of black.
Especially has criticism been directed against the
former educational efforts to aid the Negro. In the four periods I
have mentioned, we find first, boundless, planless enthusiasm
and sacrifice; then the preparation of teachers for a vast
public school system; then the launching and expansion of that
school system amid increasing difficulties; finally the training
of workmen for the new and growing industries. This development has
been sharply ridiculed as a logical anomaly and flat reversal of
nature. Soothly we have been told that first industrial and manual
training should have taught the Negro to work, then simple schools
should have taught him to read and write, and finally, after years,
high and normal schools could have completed the system, as
intelligence and wealth demanded.
That a system logically so complete was historically impossible, it
needs but a little thought to prove. Progress in human affairs is more
often a pull than a push, surging forward of the exceptional man, and
the lifting of his duller brethren slowly and painfully to his vantage
ground. Thus it was no accident that gave birth to universities
centuries before the common schools, that made fair Harvard the first
flower of our wilderness. So in the South: the mass of the freedmen at
the end of the war lacked the intelligence so necessary to modern
workingmen. They must first have the common school to teach them to
read, write, and cipher. The white teachers who flocked South
went to establish such a common school system. They had no idea of
founding colleges; they themselves at first would have laughed at the
idea. But they faced, as all men since them have faced, that central
paradox of the South, the social separation of the races. Then it was
the sudden volcanic rupture of nearly all relations between black and
white, in work and government and family life. Since then a new
adjustment of relations in economic and political affairs has grown up
-- an adjustment subtle and difficult to grasp, yet singularly
ingenious, which leaves still that frightful chasm at the color line
across which men pass at their peril. Thus, then and now, there stand
in the South two separate worlds; and separate not simply in
the higher realms of social intercourse, but also in church
and school, on railway and street car, in hotels and theatres,
in streets and city sections, in books and newspapers, in
asylums and jails, in hospitals and graveyards. There is still enough
of contact for large economic and group cooperation, but
the separation is so thorough and deep, that it absolutely
precludes for the present between the races anything like that
sympathetic and effective group training and leadership of the one by
the other, such as the American Negro and all backward peoples must
have for effectual progress.
This the missionaries of '68 soon saw; and if effective
industrial and trade schools were impractical before the establishment
of a common school system, just as certainly no adequate common
schools could be founded until there were teachers to teach them.
Southern whites would not teach them; Northern whites in sufficient
numbers could not be had. If the Negro was to learn, he must teach
himself, and the most effective help that could be given him was the
establishment of schools to train Negro teachers. This conclusion was
slowly but surely reached by every student of the situation until
simultaneously, in widely separated regions, without consultation or
systematic plan, there arose a series of institutions designed to
furnish teachers for the untaught. Above the sneers of critics at the
obvious defects of this procedure must ever stand its one
crushing rejoinder: in a single generation they put thirty thousand
black teachers in the South; they wiped out the illiteracy of
the majority of the black people of the land, and they made Tuskegee
possible.
Such higher training schools tended naturally to deepen broader
development: at first they were common and grammar schools, then some
became high schools. And finally, by 1900, some thirty-four had one
year or more of studies of college grade. This development was reached
with different degrees of speed in different institutions: Hampton is
still a high school, while Fisk University started her college in 1871,
and Spelman Seminary about 1896. In all cases the aim was identical:
to maintain the standards of the lower training by giving
teachers and leaders the best practicable training; and above all
to furnish the black world with adequate standards of human culture
and lofty ideals of life. It was not enough that the teachers of
teachers should be trained in technical normal method; they must also,
so far as possible, be broad-minded, cultured men and women, to scatter
civilization among a people whose ignorance was not simply of letters,
but of life itself.
It can thus be seen that the work of education in the South began
with higher institutions of training, which threw off as their foliage
common schools, and later industrial schools, and at the same time
strove to shoot their roots ever deeper toward college and university
training. That this was an inevitable and necessary development, sooner
or later, goes without saying; but there has been, and still is, a
question in many minds if the natural growth was not forced, and if the
higher training was not either overdone or done with cheap and unsound
methods. Among white Southerners this feeling is widespread
and positive. A prominent Southern journal voiced this in a
recent editorial:
The experiment that has been made to give the colored students
classical training has not been satisfactory. Even though many were
able to pursue the course, most of them did so in a parrotlike way,
learning what was taught, but not seeming to appropriate the truth and
import of their instruction, and graduating without sensible aim or
valuable occupation for their future. The whole scheme has proved a
waste of time, efforts, and money of the state.
While most fair-minded men would recognize this as extreme and
overdrawn, still without doubt many are asking, Are there a sufficient
number of Negroes ready for college training to warrant the
undertaking? Are not too many students prematurely forced into this
work? Does it not have the effect of dissatisfying the young Negro with
his environment? And do these graduates succeed in real life? Such
natural questions cannot be evaded, nor on the other hand must a
nation naturally skeptical as to Negro ability assume an
unfavorable answer without careful inquiry and patient openness
to conviction. We must not forget that most Americans answer
all queries regarding the Negro a priori, and that the least
that human courtesy can do is to listen to evidence.
The advocates of the higher education of the Negro would be the last
to deny the incompleteness and glaring defects of the present system:
too many institutions have attempted to do college work, the work in
some cases has not been thoroughly done, and quantity rather than
quality has sometimes been sought. But all this can be said of higher
education throughout the land: it is the almost inevitable incident of
educational growth, and leaves the deeper question of the
legitimate demand for the higher training of Negroes untouched. And
this latter question can be settled in but one way -- by a
first-hand study of the facts. If we leave out of view all institutions
which have not actually graduated students from a course higher
than that of a New England high school, even though they be
called colleges; if then we take the thirty-four remaining
institutions, we may clear up many misapprehensions by asking
searchingly, What kind of institutions are they, what do they teach,
and what sort of men do they graduate?
And first we may say that this type of college, including
Atlanta, Fisk and Howard, Shaw, and the rest, is peculiar,
almost unique. Through the shining trees that whisper before me as
I write, I catch glimpses of a boulder of New England
granite, covering a grave, which graduates of Atlanta University
have placed there: --
IN GRATEFUL MEMORY OF THEIR FORMER TEACHER AND FRIEND AND OF THE
UNSELFISH LIFE HE LIVED, AND THE NOBLE WORK HE WROUGHT; THAT THEY,
THEIR CHILDREN, AND THEIR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN MIGHT BE BLESSED.
This was the gift of New England to the freed Negro: not alms, but a
friend; not cash, but character. It was not and is not money these
seething millions want, but love and sympathy, the pulse of hearts
beating with red blood; a gift which to-day only their own kindred and
race can bring to the masses, but which once saintly souls brought to
their favored children in the crusade of the sixties, that finest thing
in American history, and one of the few things untainted by sordid
greed and cheap vainglory. The teachers in these institutions came not
to keep the Negroes in their place, but to raise them out of their
places where the filth of slavery had wallowed them. The colleges
they founded were social settlements; homes where the best of
the sons of the freedmen came in close and sympathetic touch
with the best traditions of New England. They lived and
ate together, studied and worked, hoped and harkened in the dawning
light. In actual formal content their curriculum was doubtless
old-fashioned, but in educational power it was supreme, for it was the
contact of living souls.
From such schools about two thousand Negroes have gone forth with
the bachelor's degree. The number in itself is enough to put at rest
the argument that too large a proportion of Negroes are receiving
higher training. If the ratio to population of all Negro students
throughout the land, in both college and secondary training, be
counted, Commissioner Harris assures us "it must be increased to five
times it present average" to equal the average of the land.
Fifty years ago the ability of Negro students in any
appreciable numbers to master a modern college course would have
been difficult to prove. To-day it is proved by the fact that
four hundred Negroes, many of whom have been reported as brilliant
students, have received the bachelor's degree from Harvard, Yale,
Oberlin, and seventy other leading colleges. Here we have, then nearly
twenty-five hundred Negro graduates, of whom the crucial query must be
made, How far did their training fit them for life? It is of course
extremely difficult to collect satisfactory data on such a point, --
difficult to reach the men, to get trustworthy testimony, and to
gauge that testimony by any generally acceptable criterion of
success. In 1900, the Conference at Atlanta University undertook
to study these graduates, and published the results. First
they sought to know what these graduates were doing, and succeeded
in getting answers from nearly two thirds of the living. The direct
testimony was in almost all cases corroborated by the reports of the
colleges where they graduated, so that in the main the reports were
worthy of credence. Fifty-three per cent of these graduates
were teachers, -- presidents of institutions, heads of normal
schools, principals of city school systems, and the like. Seventeen
per cent were clergymen; another seventeen per cent were in
the professions, chiefly as physicians. over six per cent
were merchants, farmers, and artisans, and four per cent were in
the government civil service. Granting even that a
considerable proportion of the third unheard from are unsuccessful,
this is a record of usefulness. Personally I know many hundreds
of these graduates, and have corresponded with more than a thousand;
through others I have followed carefully the life-work of scores; I
have taught some of them and some of the pupils whom they have taught,
lived in homes which they have builded, and looked at life through
their eyes. Comparing them as a class with my fellow students in New
England and in Europe, I cannot hesitate in saying that nowhere have I
met men and women with a broader spirit of helpfulness, with deeper
devotion to their life-work, or with more consecrated determination to
succeed in the face of bitter difficulties than among Negro
college-bred men. They have, to be sure, their proportion of
ne'er-do-weels, their pedants and lettered fools, but they have a
surprisingly small proportion of them; they have not that culture of
manner which we instinctively associate with university men, forgetting
that in reality it is the heritage from cultured homes, and that no
people a generation removed from slavery can escape a certain
unpleasant rawness and gaucherie, despite the best of training.
With all their larger vision and deeper sensibility, these men have
usually been conservative, careful leaders. They have seldom been
agitators, have withstood the temptation to head the mob, and have
worked steadily and faithfully in a thousand communities in the South.
As teachers they have given the South a commendable system of city
schools and large numbers of private normal schools and academies.
Colored college-bred men have worked side by side with white
college graduates at Hampton; almost from the beginning the
backbone of Tuskegee's teaching force has been formed of
graduates from Fisk and Atlanta. And to-day the institute is filled
with college graduates, from the energetic wife of the principal
down to the teacher of agriculture, including nearly half of
the executive council and a majority of the heads of departments. In
the professions, college men are slowly but surely leavening the Negro
church, are healing and preventing the devastations of disease, and
beginning to furnish legal protection for the liberty and property of
the toiling masses. All this is needful work. Who would do it if
Negroes did not? How could Negroes do it if they were not trained
carefully for it? If white people need colleges to furnish teachers,
ministers, lawyers, and doctors, do black people need nothing of the
sort?
If it be true that there are an appreciable number of Negro youth in
the land capable by character and talent to receive that higher
training, the end of which is culture, and if the two and a half
thousand who have had something of this training in the past have in
the main proved themselves useful to their race and generation, the
question then comes, What place in the future development of the South
ought the Negro college and college-bred man to occupy? That the
present social separation and acute race sensitiveness must eventually
yield to the influences of culture as the South grows civilized is
clear. But such transformation calls for singular wisdom and
patience. If, while the healing of this vast sore is progressing, the
races are to live for many years side by side, united in
economic effort, obeying a common government, sensitive to
mutual thought and feeling, yet subtly and silently separate in
many matters of deeper human intimacy -- if this unusual
and dangerous development is to progress amid peace and
order, mutual respect and growing intelligence, it will call for
social surgery at once the delicatest and nicest in modern history.
It will demand broad-minded, upright men both white and black, and
in its final accomplishment American civilization will triumph. So far
as white men are concerned, this fact is to-day being recognized in the
South, and a happy renaissance of university education seems imminent.
But the very voices that cry Hail! to this good work are, strange to
relate, largely silent or antagonistic to the higher education of the
Negro.
Strange to relate! for this is certain, no secure civilization
can be built in the South with the Negro as an ignorant,
turbulent proletariat. Suppose we seek to remedy this by making
them laborers and nothing more: they are not fools, they have
tasted of the Tree of Life, and they will not cease to think, will
not cease attempting to read the riddle of the world. By taking away
their best equipped teachers and leaders, by slamming the door of
opportunity in the faces of their bolder and brighter minds, will you
make them satisfied with their lot? or will you not rather transfer
their leading from the hands of men taught to think to the hands of
untrained demagogues? We ought not to forget that despite the pressure
of poverty, and despite the active discouragement and even ridicule of
friends, the demand for higher training steadily increases among Negro
youth: there were in the years from 1875 to 1880, twenty-two
Negro graduates from Northern colleges; from 1885 to 1890 there were
forty-three, and from 1895 to 1900, nearly 100 graduates. Here, then,
is the plain thirst for training; by refusing to give this Talented
Tenth the key to knowledge can any sane man imagine that they will
lightly lay aside their yearning and contentedly become hewers of wood
and drawers of water?
No. The dangerously clear logic of the Negro's position will more
and more loudly assert itself in that day when increasing wealth and
more intricate social organization preclude the South from being, as it
so largely is, simply an armed camp for intimidating black folk. Such
waste of energy cannot be spared if the South is to catch up with
civilization. And as the black third of the land grows in thrift and
skill, unless skillfully guided in its larger philosophy, it must more
and more brood over the red past and the creeping, crooked present,
until it grasps a gospel of revolt and revenge and throws its new-found
energies athwart the current of advance. Even to-day the masses of
the Negroes see all too clearly the anomalies of their position
and the moral crookedness of yours. You may marshal
strong indictments against them, but their counter-cries, lacking
though they be in formal logic, have burning truths within them
which you may not wholly ignore, O Southern Gentlemen! If
you deplore their presence here, they ask, Who brought us? When you
shriek, Deliver us from the vision of intermarriage, they answer, that
legal marriage is infinitely better than systematic concubinage and
prostitution. And if in just fury you accuse their vagabonds of
violating women, they also in fury quite as just may wail: the rape
which your gentlemen have done against helpless black women in defiance
of your own laws is written on the foreheads of two millions of
mulattoes, and written in in-effaceable blood. And finally, when you
fasten crime upon this race as its peculiar train, they answer that
slavery was the arch-crime, and lynching and lawlessness its twin
abortion; that color and race are not crimes, and yet they it is which
in this land receive most unceasing condemnation, North, East,
South, and West.
I will not say such arguments are wholly justified -- I will
not insist that there is no other side to the shield; but I do say
that of the nine millions of Negroes in this nation, there is
scarcely one out of the cradle to whom these arguments do not
daily present themselves in the guise of terrible truth. I insist that
the question of the future is how best to keep these millions
from brooding over the wrongs of the past and the difficulties of
the present, so that all their energies may be bent toward a
cheerful striving and cooperation with their white neighbors toward
a larger, juster, and fuller future. That one wise method of
doing this lies in the closer knitting of the Negro to the great
industrial possibilities of the South is a great truth. And this the
common schools and the manual training and trade schools are
working to accomplish. But these alone are not enough. The
foundations of knowledge in this race, as in others, must be sunk deep
in the college and university if we would build a solid,
permanent structure. Internal problems of social advance must
inevitably come, -- problems of work and wages, of families and
homes, of morals and the true valuing of the things of life; and all
these and other inevitable problems of civilization the Negro
must meet and solve largely for himself, by reason of his
isolation; and can there be any possible solution other than by study
and thought and an appeal to the rich experience of the past?
Is there not, with such a group and in such a crisis, infinitely
more danger to be apprehended from half-trained minds and
shallow thinking than from over-education and over-refinement?
Surely we have wit enough to found a Negro college so manned
and equipped as to steer successfully between the dilettante and
the fool. We shall hardly induce black men to believe that if
their bellies be full it matters little about their brains. They
already dimly perceive that the paths of peace winding between
honest toil and dignified manhood call for the guidance of
skilled thinkers, the loving, reverent comradeship between the
black lowly and black men emancipated by training and culture.
The function of the Negro college then is clear: it must
maintain the standards of popular education, it must seek the
social regeneration of the Negro, and it must help in the solution
of problems of race contact and cooperation. And finally, beyond all
this, it must develop men. Above our modern socialism, and out of the
worship of the mass, must persist and evolve that higher individualism
which the centres of culture protect; there must come a loftier respect
for the sovereign human souls that seeks to know itself and the world
about it; that seeks a freedom for expansion and self-development; that
will love and hate and labor in its own way, untrammeled alike by old
and new. Such souls aforetime have inspired and guided worlds, and
if we be not wholly bewitched by our Rhine-gold, they shall again.
Herein the longing of black men must have respect: the rich and bitter
depth of their experience, the unknown treasures of their inner life,
the strange rendings of nature they have seen, may give the world new
points of view and make their loving, living, and doing precious to all
human hearts. And to themselves in these the days that try their souls
the chance to soar in the dim blue air above the smoke is to their
finer spirits boon and guerdon for what they lose on earth by being
black.
I sit with Shakespeare and he winces not. Across the color line I
move arm in arm with Balzac and Dumas, where smiling men and welcoming
women glide in gilded halls. From out the caves of Evening that swing
between the strong-limbed earth and the tracery of the stars, I summon
Aristotle and Aurelius and what souls I will, and they come all
graciously with no scorn nor condescension. So, wed with Truth, I dwell
above the Veil. Is this the life you grudge us, O knightly America? Is
this the life you long to change into the dull red hideousness of
Georgia? Are you so afraid lest peering from this high Pisgrah,
between Philistine and Amalekite, we sight the Promised
Land?
|